Testimony of Artist Tift Merritt delivered at FCC Field Hearing,
Durham, NC
March 31, 2003
Good afternoon. Thank you very much for giving me some time to speak
to you. I want to lend my apologies to those of you who were expecting
T Bone Burnett. I am the minor star substitute in his place. My name is
Tift Merritt and I am a recording artist. You probably havent heard
of me because Im not on your radio. That being the case I need to
give you a little background. I am on Lost Highway records, home also
of Johnny Cash and Willie Nelson. My debut record, Bramble Rose
was released last June. Time Magazine named it the #6 best record of 2002;
Billboard called me a major new artist". CMT, the national
country music network, regularly played my video. I performed on David
Letterman; here I am in a Vanity Fair shoot. Of my record, the associated
press wrote: There isnt going to be a better debut album this
year. The single is an irresistibly catchy confection that would be playing
on all car radios this summer in a more perfect world.
I want to make very clear that I am not here to whine that Im not
queen of the airwaves.
Im here as a North Carolinian. My band and I all call North Carolina
home, and the support of our North Carolina fans has allowed us to accomplish
what we have. Im here because the radio has been a friend to me,
like my record collection has. Chris Stamey, a NC record producer put
the public airwaves in perspective for me: A diversified radio dial to
acts as a kind of collective consciousness of America. So when you sweep
through the stations, you take a pulse of the country, not just the pulse
of a few people on board a conglomerate. I recently read an article in
Fortune Magazine in which the President of Clear Channel, Lowry Mays,
stated that his company is not interested at all in music or songs or
DJs. Theyre in advertising. That is why I am here. I very
distressed that the FCC would feel comfortable allowing the responsibility
of the public airwaves to fall the hands of people who care nothing about
content. And were debating handing them more allowing the
waves to become overwhelmed by the bottom line.
Im also here because these regulations do affect my career. I dont
live by a pool. I am trying to make pay roll. I could very well be a casualty
of these decisions. Let me show you.
Last summer, with my band, I was opening for Willie Nelson here in Cary
at the outdoor pavilion Regency Park. Our local country station, WQDR,
was involved with promoting and presenting the show. WQDR asked me to
appear on the air, to perform a few songs live. I was happy to do it.
The DJs were as kind and enthusiastic as they could be. After the
performance, we talked about how many people in NC were fans of mine and
that in fact I was selling as many records in NC as the folks regularly
on their broadcast mainstream country stars like Toby Keith or
Alan Jackson. Both after my performance on air as well as the performance
with Willie Nelson, people called the station and asked to hear me I
know this because a lot of them came up and told me, or emailed my website.
Many folks gave me a full report of talking to the station. Above and
beyond that, I was making inroads on the national country scene; one might
venture to think that my hometown station would be supportive, if not
ecstatic to have me in their programming.
I was never played. Not twice. Not once.
I want to see this not through my eyes, but through my fathers for
a minute. My father naturally believes: If youre good enough,
youll be on the radio. However, in the days following the
WQDR incident, a black cloud began to form in his mind and he began to
question the radio:
- The station had received numerous requests for my tune.
- He could drive by the station on his way to the grocery store and could
not understand why I was on national television but not on the station
up the street.
- The station was aware that I was selling mainstream numbers in the stations
listening area, and competitive with their playlist.
- The DJs WANTED to play my record, but people who called in to
request me were told that management had to change the programming, which
never happened.
Advocates for deregulation claim that airplay is place of healthy competition.
How can that be true in this case?
Large radio conglomerates claim that programming is localized. How can
that be true in this case?
Deregulation proponents claim that the airwaves are still public. How,
when the station disregards the listeners in signal range, can that be
true?
In fact, getting on the radio has very little to do with quality performance,
hard work, fans, or being good enough. Which to me makes it
sound like getting on the radio is down right opposite of the open market
or the pulse of America. A few are keeping the radio for themselves. I
want to make it very clear: I run a business, not a star game with secret
ingredients. My realistic, small business as a musician was boxed out
of competition in this situation. The fewer the radio station owners,
the less the concern about content, the more monotony on every playlist,
the more I will continue to be locked out. Youre going to lose thousands
of people like me people who employ musicians, lawyers, technicians,
CPAs, booking agents, managers, hotels, fed-ex, people who deliver 500
people to your Main Street on a any given night. But what is most important
is that these peoples music will be silenced by a management playlist.
I will leave you with an appeal to my local NC politicians, to remind
you of just a few musicians from NC John Coltrane, Roberta Flack,
Thelonius Monk, Earl Scruggs, Doc Watson, Max Roach. NC musicians have
helped to shape this nations musical heritage, and helped make this
state unique, cherished and treasured by millions of people around the
world. If you give young musicians no possibility of making a living,
if you give the radio waves to people with no regard for music, if you
stifle musical outlets with the unfettered interest in the bottom line
by a few, you will scatter the next generation of NC talent. They will
rightly pick up something more feasible than an instrument to voice their
heartache and their joy.
Senate Panel Votes to Change FCC Decision Senate Committee Approves Bill
to Roll Back FCC Changes in Media Ownership Rules AP,
June 19, 2003
Write Letters to your Members of Congress and Key Policymakers
Even though the FCC voted 3-2 on June 2 to relax media ownership rules,
the fight is not over -- it hust moves over to Congress where a number
of key Senate Committees are considering legislation that would roll back
some of the FCC's recent rule changes.
If you have a story or an opinion on these issues, contact your members
of Congress. This can happen by phone or email. To find your representatives
addresses visit http://www.congress.org
Here are some additional policymakers who need to hear from citizens who
are concerned about media consolidation:
Senator John McCain
241 Russell Senate Office Bldg.
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510 McCain is chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, which
deals with these matters.
Senator Ernest Hollings
125 Russell Senate Office Bldg.
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510 Hollings is the minority chair of the Senate Commerce Committee and
would most likely support legislation restraining further consolidation
Senator Russell Feingold
506 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-4904
Feingold has already introduced the Competition
in Radio and Concert Industries Act -- legislation that would curb
the negative impacts of radio consolidation.
more news stories...
The big blackout Surprise, surprise: The TV networks that will benefit from the new
FCC rules on media ownership have been keeping their viewers in the dark
about the changes.
By Eric Boehlert Salon.com,
March 22, 2003