future of Music Coalition
endorse the
Frequently Asked Questions
Join the mailing list

Other Organizations' Statements on MGM v Grokster

Joint Statement from AFM, AFTRA, Directors' Guild, Screen Actors Guild, Writers Guild of America
Public Knowledge
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Congressmembers Steny Hoyer and Mary Bono
Congresswoman Diane Watson
Recording Artists' Coalition
National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS)
RIAA
MPAA
Senator John Cornyn
Congressman Howard Berman



Statement of AFMAFTRA Directors GuildScreen Actors GuildWriters Guild of America

CREATIVE COMMUNITY PRAISES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN GROKSTER CASE

June 27, 2005

In a decision announced today, the United States Supreme Court overturned the ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of the plaintiffs in the case of MGM, et al. v. Grokster, Ltd., et al.  

The following is a joint statement from the preeminent entertainment unions – American Federation of Musicians, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, Directors Guild of America, Screen Actors Guild, and Writers Guild of America, west – on today’s Supreme Court ruling.  These organizations also filed a “friend of the court” brief in January 2005 urging the Court to consider the negative impact of Internet piracy on artists.

“Today a clear and unmistakable message has been sent – that work created by our members deserves the same basic financial protections as every other product in the marketplace.  Unauthorized file-swapping of copyrighted material is property theft, plain and simple, and this theft destroys the very protections that allow our members to sustain a career and provide for their families.  We applaud the Supreme Court’s decision that advances in technology serve to enhance and promote, rather than undermine, the vibrant and diverse cultural and artistic traditions of this country.

“Today’s decision marks an economic and creative victory for every creator whose livelihood has been threatened by the blatant copyright infringement running rampant on peer-to-peer sites across the Internet.  What is most important about it is the determination that just because something can be distributed freely, does not mean that it is free, and that the financial rights of creators and copyright holders can no longer be ignored.”



Public Knowledge Statement Regarding MGM v Grokster

June 27, 2005

The following statement is from Gigi B. Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, on the Grokster decision today:

"Today's Court decision in the Grokster case underscores a principle Public Knowledge has long promoted -- punish infringers, not technology. The Court has sent the case back to the trial court so that the trial process can determine whether the defendant companies intentionally encouraged infringement. What this means is, to the extent that providers of P2P technology do not intentionally encourage infringement, they are exempt from secondary liability under our copyright law. The Court also acknowledged, importantly, that there are lawful uses for peer-to-peer technology, including distribution of electronic files 'by universities, government agencies, corporations, and libraries, among others.'

"The Court is clearly aware that any technology-based rule would have chilled technological innovation. That is why their decision today re-emphasized and preserved the core principle of Sony v. Universal City Studios -- that technology alone can't be the basis of copyright liability -- and focused clearly and unambiguously on whether defendants engaged in intentional acts of encouraging infringement. The Court held expressly that liability for providing a technological tool such as the Grokster file-sharing client depends on 'clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement.' What this means is, in the absence of such clear expression or other affirmative acts fostering infringement, a company that provides peer-to-peer technology is not going to be secondarily liable under the Copyright Act."



HOYER, BONO JOINT STATEMENT ON GROKSTER RULING
Representatives Are Co-Founders of the Congressional Recording Arts and Sciences Caucus

June 27, 2005

WASHINGTON - House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (MD) and Representative Mary Bono (R-CA) released the following statement today in response to the Supreme Court's 9-0 decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.:

"We are extremely pleased that the Supreme Court's 9-0 decision in the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. case protects the innovative and copyrighted works of our nation's creative community.  This decision supports our U.S. industries that employ more than five million Americans and produce one of our top exports: intellectual property, including motion pictures and music. Furthermore, it is a strong repudiation to the rapid proliferation of copyright piracy on the internet.

Over 90% of the use of Grokster software is for infringement purposes. Therefore, this decision prevents the legitimization of peer-to-peer file sharing software programs such as Grokster that encourage and facilitate the illegal sharing of copyrighted works.   This activity subverts not only our economy, but also the creative community, such as songwriters, musicians, screen writers and other artists who drive American creative and artistic innovation.

Clearly, technological advancements have fostered the enjoyment of these creative works. There can be a future for peer-to-peer networks as long as they uphold copyright protections.  However, while we have a healthy debate on how to reconcile intellectual property laws in the face of new technologies, our government first must protect intellectual property rights.  As we move into the digital marketplace, it is incumbent upon the courts and policymakers to demonstrate that they can and will protect intellectual property rights now and in the future.  Therefore, we strongly support the decision of the Supreme Court in this case.  We are hopeful that this decision will ensure that any further litigation proceeds with the goal of ending this infringing activity."            

Congresswoman Mary Bono and Congressman Steny Hoyer are the co- founders and co-chairs of the Congressional Recording Arts and Sciences Caucus.



Electronic Frontier Foundation: Supreme Court Ruling Will Chill Technology Innovation

Copyright Liability Standard in Grokster Decision Endangers P2P and Other New Technologies

June 27, 2005

Washington, DC - Today the Supreme Court issued a ruling that could impede makers of all kinds of technologies with expensive lawsuits. The long-awaited decision in MGM v. Grokster states that P2P software manufacturers can be held liable for the infringing activities of people who use their software. This decision relies on a new theory of copyright liability that measures whether manufacturers created their wares with the "intent" of inducing consumers to infringe. It means that inventors and entrepreneurs will not only bear the costs of bringing new products to market, but also the costs of lawsuits if consumers start using their products for illegal purposes.

"Today the Supreme Court has unleashed a new era of legal uncertainty on America's innovators," said Fred von Lohmann, EFF's senior intellectual property attorney. "The newly announced inducement theory of copyright liability will fuel a new generation of entertainment industry lawsuits against technology companies. Perhaps more important, the threat of legal costs may lead technology companies to modify their products to please Hollywood instead of consumers."

The Supreme Court has also ordered the lower court to consider whether peer-to-peer companies Grokster and StreamCast can be held liable under the new standard. StreamCast is confident that it will pass muster under the new, multi-pronged test.

[more...]



Congresswoman Watson: "Supreme Court decision on Grokster a Giant Victory for American Creativity and Innovation"
 

June 27, 2005

Washington, DC – Congresswoman Diane E. Watson (CA-33rd), chair of the Congressional Entertainment Industries Caucus, today applauded the Supreme Court's unanimous decision vacating the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in MGM v. Grokster and remanding the case back to the lower court. It held that internet file-sharing services must be held responsible for intellectual property violation if they intend for their customers to use software primarily to swap songs and movies illegally.
 
"Today's unanimous decision by the Supreme Court represents a great triumph for American creativity and innovation. File sharing companies that actively coax consumers into violating copyrights laws can no longer escape legal consequences under the guise of "fair use," stated Congresswoman Watson. 'They will no longer be able to unduly profit from the talent and hard work of our nation's creators," added Watson.
 
The Supreme Court agreed to hear MGM v. Grokster in December 2004 after the 9th Circuit's ruling in favor of the defendants. At issue is whether a peer-to-peer technology company can be held financially liable for illegal activities taking place on its network. The Circuit Court, citing the 1984 Sony-Betamax decision, held that "substantial non-infringing uses" of Grokster exists and thus could not be shut down. The Supreme Court reverses, stating that "one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright. . . is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties."  
 
"Today's clear guidance from the Supreme Court will help enhance the effective enforcement of our nation's copyright laws and strengthen the public's respect for the value of intellectual property rights," said Congresswoman Watson. "I hope today's decision will send a message to all pirates that winking and nodding at digital theft will not be tolerated any more than theft itself. I am confident that the lower courts will carefully apply this well-reasoned opinion in finding Grokster and other similar companies liable for actively inducing their customers into illegal use of their products."


Statement by Neil Portnow, President of The National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. on the Supreme Court’s Ruling on MGM v. Grokster

June 27, 2005

The National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. (The Recording Academy®) represents 17,000 musicians, composers, artists, engineers, producers and songwriters and is dedicated to improving the quality of life and cultural condition for music and its makers.

"Today is a good day for music fans and the 17,000 musicians, composers, artists, engineers, producers and songwriters that are the members of the Recording Academy. By unanimously upholding the rights of creators, the Supreme Court has defended an environment for legal online music services to thrive.

As the National Academy of Recording Arts AND Sciences, our membership embraces new technologies that deliver their music to fans in innovative ways. The court is forging the way for the legal digital services - those that compensate the creative professionals - to enable music fans to hear their favorite artists wherever, whenever and however they want.

The unanimous Supreme Court opinion sends a clear message to those who use technology to encourage copyright infringement, while recognizing the importance of honest, legitimate innovation that fosters protection of the rights of creators of music.

Previously The Recording Academy submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the creative community, which depends on sales of its works to earn a living. We thank the Court for its insight into this important case and for the protection of music makers. The Academy will continue to defend its members' rights wherever and whenever necessary."

[link]


RIAA Statement On MGM V. Grokster Supreme Court Ruling

June 27, 2005

WASHINGTON -- In response to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling today in the case MGM v. Grokster, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) issued the following statement from Chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol:

"With this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court has addressed a significant threat to the U.S. economy and moved to protect the livelihoods of the more than 11 million Americans employed by the copyright industries. The Supreme Court has helped to power the digital future for legitimate online businesses – including legal file sharing networks – by holding accountable those who promote and profit from theft. This decision lays the groundwork for the dawn of a new day – an opportunity that will bring the entertainment and technology communities even closer together, with music fans reaping the rewards."

[link]


RECORDING ARTISTS’ COALITION HAILS UNANIMOUS SUPREME COURT GROKSTER DECISION IN FAVOR OF THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY

June 27, 2005

The Recording Artists’ Coalition (RAC) applauds the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Grokster case, establishing clearly for the first time that creators of unauthorized peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing systems are liable for contributory copyright infringement if they induce the users of their system to share unauthorized copyrighted music and movie files.  This decision is a victory for all recording artists, songwriters, and their fans. 

The 9-0 decision, released this morning, also paves the way for record labels and recording artists to enter into serious negotiations to license copyrighted music to the developers of P2P systems. 

“By ruling against Grokster, the Supreme Court has vindicated the rights of artists, songwriters, and copyright owners.  There is no more important case for the future of our business.  These unauthorized P2P systems promote copyright infringement on an unprecedented scale.  They make millions of dollars in advertising, but pay the artists nothing,” said Don Henley, president and co-founder of RAC.

In January 2005, RAC, the National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, along with a number of artist and songwriter associations, and 54 high-profile recording artists, filed an Amicus Brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the Grokster litigation urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit’s opinion that Grokster, Kazaa, Morpheus, and other unauthorized P2P systems are not liable for contributory copyright infringement.

The 54 recording artists who signed on to the RAC/NARAS Amicus Brief are: Don Henley, Glenn Frey, Joe Walsh & Timothy B. Schmit (the Eagles), Jimmy Buffett, Kenny "Babyface" Edmonds, “Mya” Harrison, Gavin Rossdale, Sheryl Crow, Kix Brooks & Ronnie Dunn (Brooks & Dunn), Bonnie Raitt; Natalie Maines, Martie Maguire & Emily Robison (The Dixie Chicks), Stevie Nicks, Phil Vassar, Patty Loveless, Reba McEntire; Mickey Hart & Bill Kreutzman (of The Grateful Dead), Avril Lavigne, Dido, Denyce Graves, Tom Jones; Jesse Colin Young, Sarah McLachlan, Martina McBride, Sam Moore (of Sam & Dave), Joe Terry & David White (of Danny and the Juniors), Billy Preston, Boz Scaggs, Diana Krall, Elvis Costello, Brian Wilson, Kenny Rogers, Tom Waits; Tyler Stewart, Jim Creeggan, Steven Page, Ed Robertson & Kevin Hearn (Barenaked Ladies), Deryck Whibley, Dave Baksh, Cone McCaslin & Steve Jocz (Sum 41), Brandon Hargest, Brittany Hargest, Chris Fedun & Lesley Moore (Jump 5), Bethany Dillon, Nichole Nordeman, and Michael W. Smith.

The complete text of the RAC Amicus Brief and the Supreme Court decision will be available online at www.recordingartistscoalition.com.

Artist Quotes

"We’re really glad that the Supreme Court ruled the way they did.  Anything that makes it easier for our fans to access legitimate sources of music is a good thing."
-- Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks

"Artists are not against technology.  We fully embrace P2P technology.  But artists must have a choice between systems offering music for free and systems that pay us."
-- Bonnie Raitt

“This is a question of balancing the rights of creators with current technology.  Unauthorized P2P systems are clearly inducing infringement by the users – those systems need to be held accountable.  They can and should incorporate filters to prevent the illegal downloading of copyrighted material and until such time as they do, Grokster and similar, competitive systems should be held liable for the infringement and damage they are doing to the creative community and the public-at-large.”
-- Sheryl Crow


STATEMENT FROM MPAA PRESIDENT AND CEO DAN GLICKMAN
RE: Supreme Court ruling on MGM v. Grokster

June 27, 2005

"Today's unanimous ruling is an historic victory for intellectual property in the digital age, and is good news for consumers, artists, innovation and lawful Internet businesses.

"The Supreme Court sent a strong and clear message that businesses based on theft should not and will not be allowed to flourish.

"This decision will be of utmost importance as we continue developing innovative and legitimate ways to marry content and technology so consumers can access entertainment on a variety of devices.

"Protecting intellectual property rights and aggressively combating copyright theft will keep an engine of economic growth and job creation thriving; promote innovation; strengthen legitimate businesses that unite technology and content in innovative and legal ways; and ensure a future of quality and choice for consumers in the United States and around the world."


CORNYN STATEMENT ON MGM v. GROKSTER DECISION

"Those who facilitate theft often are just as guilty as the thieves themselves"

WASHINGTON-Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), a member of the Judiciary Committee's Intellectual Property subcommittee, made the following statement Monday regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in MGM v. Grokster:

"Today, the Supreme Court reinforced the principle that those who facilitate theft often are just as guilty as the thieves themselves.

"Every day, literally millions of dollars in copyrighted works are stolen via online services.  This theft is no less wrong because it is carried out in cyberspace - rather, potentially worse than common shoplifting, it is putting thousands of Americans out of work and is damaging one of the most important and vibrant sectors of the United States economy.  Unfortunately, the services that facilitate much illegal online file sharing have been designed to encourage just that type of behavior.

"When the founding fathers put the protection of intellectual property in the Constitution, they recognized the unique and unlimited creativity of the American people and the impact American innovators would have on the world in the areas of art and technology.

"Today's decision by the Supreme Court is an affirmation of those Constitutional principles and should be commended."

Sen. Cornyn is a member of the Judiciary Committee's Intellectual Property subcommittee and the Congressional International Anti-Piracy Caucus. He served previously as Texas Supreme Court Justice, Texas Attorney General, and Bexar County District Judge.


Berman Statement on MGM v. Grokster

June 27, 2005

WASHINGTON -- In response to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling today in the case of MGM v. Grokster,  Rep. Howard L. Berman made the following statement:

"That this is a unanimous decision speaks volumes to what we all know is true:  stealing is stealing.   The culture which allowed a business to rely on theft has robbed our creative community.

"Today's ruling is a victory for American innovation. It helps assure that artists will continue to thrive and create the music and movies we love. Technology and the Internet win, too, because this decision will propel opportunities for legitimate music and movie distribution services. 

Rep. Howard Berman (CA)  is the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.

 



home | manifesto | resources | press & news | events FAQs subscribe contact us | terms of service

subscribe

Want to stay on top of music/tech issues? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Read the latest edition online here.



up front

Musicians Get the Hint About Health Insurance
Two Raleigh concerts in memory of musician Drew Glackin; proceeds go to Glackin’s family and Future of Music Coalition’s Health Insurance Navigation Tool
April 10, 2008
Press release
FMC's HINT program

New York State Music Education Events Examine Crucial Issues Facing Artists
Forums in Rochester (April 28), Syracuse (April 29) and Albany (April 30) to focus on music, media, technology and policy issues for songwriters, composers and performers from all genres.
March 25, 2008
Event details | RSVP

Pop Rockers OK Go "Tour" Congress in Support of Net Neutrality
Damian Kulash and Andy Ross discuss the importance of open Internet structures to musicians; Kulash testifies before House Judiciary Committee.
March 13, 2008
Press release
Spoken testimony

Written testimony

Rock the Net

New York State Music Education Events Examine Crucial Issues Facing Artists
Kick-off forum in Buffalo on April 2 to focus on music, media, technology and policy issues for songwriters, composers and performers from all genres.
March 7, 2008 | Event details

Philly Bands Rocking for Net Neutrality
February 23 Sugar Town show at Tritone in Philadelphia will showcase lady rockers and DJs, as well as musicians' support for net neutrality.
February 15, 2008

OK Go and Bonerama Rocked DC for New Orleans Musicians
Bands also champion FMC's "Rock the Net" campaign for net neutrality
February 2 benefit show at DC's 9:30 Club raised over $8,000 for New Orleans musicians. Bands played cuts off their new benefit EP, You're Not Alone, available on iTunes on February 5.
February 4, 2008

Upcoming Washington, DC show and benefit EP from OK Go & Bonerama
On February 2, OK Go and Bonerama will play a benefit at D.C.'s 9:30 Club in support of You're Not Alone - an EP to support Sweet Home New Orleans and Al "Carnival Time" Johnson.
January 21, 2008

Successful New Orleans Concerts Aid Big Easy Musicians
Last week, two benefit concerts raised over $6,000 for Sweet Home New Orleans - a coalition of non-profit organizations that helps find affordable housing and provides rental assistance for the city's musicians - and Big Easy music legend Al "Carnival Time" Johnson.
January 15, 2008
Press release | Event details

FMC's Latest Fact Sheets
HD Radio
Low Power FM Radio
Orphan Works
Public Performance Right for Sound Recordings
Traveling with Instruments
Touring Internationally
SoundExchange
Net Neutrality
Full Power Non-Commerical Radio Licenses
Media Ownership

Ann Chaitovitz Appointed
FMC's New Executive Director
A proven leader in musician and public policy issues, Chaitovitz replaces founding Executive Director Jenny Toomey
January 3, 2008

Concerts for New Orleans Musicians Bring Artists Together
Two New Orleans shows and upcoming benefit CD from OK Go and Bonerama
January 2, 2008

FMC's Jenny Toomey Appointed Program Officer for Ford Foundation
Kristin Thomson to Serve as FMC’s Interim Executive Director Michael Bracy to Chair FMC Board of Directors
November 26, 2007

Seattle "Rocked the Net"
Rep. Jay Inslee advocated network neutrality;
joined by rocker Matt Nathanson, Reclaim the Media, FMC and local music business representatives
October 31, 2007

Rock the Net: Campaign for Net Neutrality Rocks Seattle
Teleconference with Rep Jay Inslee on Tuesday, Oct 30. Matt Nathanson performs at Seattle’s Crocodile Café on Tuesday, Oct. 30
October 26, 2007

Future of Music Policy Summit to Tackle Critical Issues at the Intersection of Music, Law, Technology and Policy
Sen. Byron Dorgan and Sen. Ron Wyden to Deliver Keynote Addresses
Mac McCaughan, Bob Mould, Marybeth Peters of the U.S. Copyright Office and More Than 90 Other Panelists Confirmed.
September 10, 2007
Summit home page
Press Credentialing

AT&T's muting of bands points toward a pattern of silencing political speech
Content monitor did not edit out 20 instances of curse words during Pearl Jam webcast, despite AT&T claim it hires monitors to block "excessive profanity".
August 13, 2007

Top musicians, lawyers, technologists confirmed for FMC's 7th annual Policy Summit
August 13, 2007
Press Release
Summit home page
Press Credentialing

FMC Statement on AT&T Silencing Pearl Jam's lyrics during Lollapalooza webcast

August 9, 2007

Registration Opens for FMC's Annual Policy Summit
July 24, 2007
Press Release
Summit home page
Press Credentialing

FMC Files Request for Declaratory Ruling regarding Clear Channel Actions at Federal Communications Commission
July 13, 2007
Filing | Press release

FMC Statement on Federal Trade Commission Report on Net Neutrality
June 29, 2007

FMC files testimony with House Small Business Committee on CRB Webcasting Rates
June 27, 2007
Press Release | Testimony

Clear Channel strips local, independent artists of digital performance royalties

FMC has discovered that Clear Channel's online application for local and independent artists to submit their music for airplay on each of its stations requires the artist to approve a licensing agreement that does away with their digital performance right.
June 22, 2007

Low Power Radio Gets New Push in Congress
Congress introduces bills to create hundreds of new low power FM radio stations to cities and suburbs across the country.
June 22, 2007

FMC Announces Dates for 7th annual Policy Summit
September 17-18, 2007
GWU Betts Theatre, Washington, DC
June 11, 2007

FMC Organizes "Musicians Bringing Musicians Home II"
A Benefit Concert on May 27 at New Orleans' Tipitina's for Sweet Home New Orleans featuring: Indigo Girls, Damian Kulash of OK Go, Jim James of My Morning Jacket, Matt Nathanson, Pamela Z...and special guests
May 23, 2007
Press Release | Details

Congressman Mike Doyle to address conference on music, law and technology
May 2 event will bring together leading experts from worlds of music, law, technology and policy.
April 25, 2007

A2IM Endorses Rock the Net Campaign
American Association of Independent Music urges its label members to join the campaign for network neutrality.
April 17, 2007

Music Mashes with Policy at upcoming Technology and IP Policy Day
May 2 event will bring together leading experts from worlds of music, law, technology and policy.
April 16, 2007

FMC Applauds FCC's Payola Settlement
Payola agreement by FCC and big broadcast chains represents a major - but tentative - step toward once again opening the nation's airwaves to local music and voices.
April 13, 2007

Rep. Edward Markey, Ted Leo kick off "Rock the Net"
Nearly 150 artists and labels have already signed onto campaign for net neutrality
March 27, 2007
Press Release | Rock the Net

Major Artists To Join Launch of Rock the Net Campaign for Net Neutrality
March 23, 2007

FMC Statement on CRB Webcasting Rates
March 19, 2007

FMC Statement on FCC's "Rules of Engagement" On Payola
March 5, 2007

FMC Files Reply Comments in FCC Media Ownership Proceeding
January 16, 2007

FMC Statement on FCC Payola Settlement
FMC's statement on FCC's reported consent decree with the broadcast industry in regards to payola.
January 16, 2007

Radio Station Ownership Consolidation Shown to Harm Musicians and the Public
FMC study shows that the rapid consolidation of the commercial radio industry that followed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 has led to a loss of localism, less competition, fewer viewpoints and less diversity in radio programming in media markets across the country.
December 13, 2006
Press release
Report details

Jenny Toomey Testifies at FCC Media Ownership Hearing, Nashville, TN
December 11, 2006
Read FMC's testimony
Link to FCC webcast

FMC Organizes Musicians Bringing Musicians Home
Benefit concert at New Orleans' Tipitina's on November 6th featuring Steve Earle, Mike Mills, Allison Moorer, Tom Morello, Boots Riley, Corin Tucker and special guests.
October 23, 2006
Read press release
Read press coverage

FMC and AFM File Joint Comments at FCC in 2006 Media Ownership Proceeding

October 23, 2006
Executive Summary
PDF of comments

Job Losses Associated with Radio Consolidation Undermine Localism and Diversity
FMC, Newspaper Guild and Consumers Union urge FCC to take employment effects of their policies into account during upcoming review of media ownership rules
August 9, 2006

FMC Releases Research on Employment and Wage Effects of Radio Consolidaton
August 9, 2006

FMC on Preserving the Dynamism of the Internet
Opinion Piece on ABC News
June 29, 2006

FMC Statement on Senate Commerce Committee Vote in Support of LPFM
June 28, 2006

FMC Statement on FCC Media Ownership Proceeding
June 21, 2006

Indie-rock revolution, fueled by net neutrality
Op-ed by FMC's Jenny Toomey and Michael Bracy
June 13, 2006

Pearl Jam Donation To Help Musicians Help Themselves
Proceeds From Washington, DC Appearance to be Donated to FMC Artist Research Council
May 25, 2006
Press Release

FMC signs on letter to preserve net neutrality
May 17, 2006

FMC Announces Dates for Sixth Annual Future of Music Policy Summit
October 5-7, 2006
Media Advisory May 15, 2006

FMC Urges FCC to Investigate Allegations of Radio Payola
February 15, 2006
Letter to FCC | Press Release

FMC Statement on Release of Feingold's Radio and Concert Disclosure and Competition Act of 2005
November 18, 2005

FMC Sends Letter to Senate Commerce Committee in Support of a Public Performance Right for Sound Recordings
October 19, 2005

Top Names in Music, Law, Technology and Policy Return to Debate Critical Issues at Fifth Annual Future of Music Policy Summit
September 6, 2005
Media Advisory | Policy Summit home page

FMC Announces Health Insurance Navigation Tool
August 9, 2005
HINT Home Page

5th Annual Future of Music Policy Summit Announced
July 26, 2005
Media Advisory | Policy Summit home page

FMC Statement on MGM v Grokster and Brand X
June 27, 2005
Statement | Links to other organizations' statements

FMC Press Release: Music Mashes with Policy at DC Policy Day
April 8, 2005

FMC's Michael Bracy Testifies in front of House Judiciary Committee on "Digital Music Interoperability"
April 6, 2005

FMC files comments at US Copyright Office on "Orphan Works"
Comments also ask Copyright Office to consider status of out-of-print recordings
March 25, 2005

FMC Sends Letter to Senate Stating Concerns about S 193, Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act
March 10, 2005

FMC and artist groups file joint reply comments at FCC on localism in broadcasting, MB Docket 04-233
January 3, 2005
PDF of document